Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 53 | 84.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| BLU | LG |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-04-11 |
| 5.69 x 2.81 x 0.41 inches | 5.98 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Aurora black, Carmine red and Platinum gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 205.00 | $ 215.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Quad-Core 1300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.06 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.48 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 1090 hours standby time 52 hours talk time | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG G8 ThinQ is a lot better than the BLU Studio Energy, having a general score of 84.3 against 53. The LG G8 ThinQ is a just a little bit lighter and thinner phone than the BLU Studio Energy. Both devices we are comparing here work with Android OS (Operating System), but LG G8 ThinQ has 9.0 Pie version and BLU Studio Energy has Android 4.4.2.
LG G8 ThinQ has a better screen than BLU Studio Energy, because it has a much better resolution of 1440 x 3120, a lot more pixels per screen inch and a bigger screen. The LG G8 ThinQ counts with a superior processing power than BLU Studio Energy, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics co-processor, it also counts with a higher number of cores and a greater amount of RAM memory.
The LG G8 ThinQ captures much clearer videos and photos than BLU Studio Energy, because it has a much better resolution back-facing camera and a way better 3840x2160 video resolution. LG G8 ThinQ has much more storage capacity for games and applications than BLU Studio Energy, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 1,95 TB and 120 GB more internal memory.
BLU Studio Energy features a much longer battery duration than LG G8 ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
The LG G8 ThinQ costs a bit more money than BLU Studio Energy, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.