Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 53 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| BLU | LG |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.69 x 2.81 x 0.41 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 205.00 | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Quad-Core 1300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.06 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.48 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 1090 hours standby time 52 hours talk time | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V40 ThinQ is way better than BLU Studio Energy, with a global score of 81.2 against 53. The LG V40 ThinQ body is notably thinner and a little bit lighter than the BLU Studio Energy. These devices use Android operating system, but LG V40 ThinQ has 10 version while BLU Studio Energy has Android 4.4.2 version.
The LG V40 ThinQ counts with a better performance than BLU Studio Energy, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processing unit, it also counts with more cpu cores and a higher amount of RAM memory. LG V40 ThinQ counts with a little bit better looking display than BLU Studio Energy, because it has a way higher 1440 x 3120 resolution, a way higher amount of pixels per inch of display and a larger screen.
LG V40 ThinQ shoots way better pictures and videos than BLU Studio Energy, because it has a much better (4K) video quality and a camera in the back with much more MP. The LG V40 ThinQ features a superior memory for applications, games, photos and videos than BLU Studio Energy, because it has a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB and 64 GB internal storage.
The BLU Studio Energy features a much better battery performance than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, LG V40 ThinQ is also cheap compared to the BLU Studio Energy, which makes this phone a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.