Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 53 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| BLU | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.2 | -- |
| -- | 2019-03-15 |
| 5.69 x 2.81 x 0.41 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 205.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Quad-Core 1300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 (500 MHz) GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.06 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.48 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 1090 hours standby time 52 hours talk time | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50 is a lot better than the BLU Studio Energy, with a general score of 83.8 against 53. The Galaxy A50 is a just a bit lighter and thinner cellphone than BLU Studio Energy. The Samsung Galaxy A50 has a bit more powerful processing unit than BLU Studio Energy, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processing unit, it also counts with a higher number of cores (and they are faster) and a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy A50 and BLU Studio Energy feature quite similar screens, although the Galaxy A50 also has a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2340, a greater number of pixels per inch in the display and a bigger screen. The Galaxy A50 shoots a lot better photos and videos than BLU Studio Energy, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 video definition and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy A50 also has a back camera with a way higher resolution.
The Galaxy A50 has a much bigger memory capacity for apps and games than BLU Studio Energy, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB and 128 GB internal memory capacity. The BLU Studio Energy has greater battery performance than Galaxy A50, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the Galaxy A50 is also cheaper than the other phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.