Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 51.5 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| BLU | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.2 | -- |
| -- | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.12 x 3.02 x 0.42 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold, Pink and White | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 125.00 | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Quad-Core 1300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.06 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.48 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 800 hours standby time 28 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.56 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S7 is way better than the BLU Studio X Plus, having a 79.5 score against 51.5. Galaxy S7 is a thinner and lighter phone than the BLU Studio X Plus. The Galaxy S7 counts with a much more vibrant screen than BLU Studio X Plus, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a way higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a lot more pixels per display inch.
Galaxy S7 features much more storage capacity for apps and games than BLU Studio X Plus, because it has 32 GB internal storage and a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 200 GB. The Samsung Galaxy S7 has a bit superior processing unit than BLU Studio X Plus, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processor, and they both have a Quad-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy S7 also counts with 3 GB more RAM memory.
Galaxy S7 takes a lot better videos and photos than BLU Studio X Plus, because it has a much better 3840x2160 video quality and a back-facing camera with much more mega pixels. Samsung Galaxy S7 counts with a bit longer battery performance than BLU Studio X Plus, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, Galaxy S7 is also cheaper than the BLU Studio X Plus, making this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.