Search


Compare phones

Global Score
23.727.9
Basic Information
BLUCricket
--2009-09-22
4.15 x 1.77 x 0.50 inches3.54 x 1.81 x 0.74 inches
--2.82 ounces
Black, Blue, Red and Yellow--
$ 40.00$ 40.00
Display / Screen
1.3 inches1.8 inches
96 x 64 pixels 128 x 160 pixels
--TFT
89 pixels per inch114 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
4.85.4
processor processor
GPU GPU
5.765.76
Storage
16,38 MB internal memory--
No SD card slotNo SD card slot
0.30
Camera
--0.30 MP
03.63
GSMCDMA
SIM--
0.10.1
Battery Life
500mAh Li-Ion Battery920mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
400 hours standby time
8 hours talk time
250 hours standby time
5 hours talk time
1.682.48
Other Features
--Bluetooth

Comparison review

The Cricket CAPTR is better than the BLU ULTRA, getting a score of 27.9 against 23.7. Cricket CAPTR counts with a better looking screen than BLU ULTRA, because it has a lot better 160 x 128 resolution, a better pixels density and a way bigger display. BLU ULTRA has much more memory capacity to store more games and applications than Cricket CAPTR.

Cricket CAPTR and BLU ULTRA both have similar processing units, they have a 0-Core CPU. Cricket CAPTR shoots much better photographs and videos than BLU ULTRA. The Cricket CAPTR counts with a really longer battery lifetime than BLU ULTRA, because it has a 920mAh battery capacity against 500mAh.

Cricket CAPTR costs exactly the same than BLU ULTRA.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.