Compare phones
BLU ULTRA
T100b| Global Score | |
| 23.7 | 27.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| BLU | Cricket |
| -- | 2009-09-22 |
| 4.15 x 1.77 x 0.50 inches | 3.54 x 1.81 x 0.74 inches |
| -- | 2.82 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red and Yellow | -- |
| $ 40.00 | $ 40.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 1.3 inches | 1.8 inches |
| 96 x 64 pixels | 128 x 160 pixels |
| -- | TFT |
| 89 pixels per inch | 114 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 4.8 | 5.4 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| 16,38 MB internal memory | -- |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 0.3 | 0 |
| Camera | |
| -- | 0.30 MP |
| 0 | 3.63 |
| GSM | CDMA |
| SIM | -- |
| 0.1 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 500mAh Li-Ion Battery | 920mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 400 hours standby time 8 hours talk time | 250 hours standby time 5 hours talk time |
| 1.68 | 2.48 |
| Other Features | |
| -- | Bluetooth |
Comparison review
The Cricket CAPTR is better than the BLU ULTRA, getting a score of 27.9 against 23.7. Cricket CAPTR counts with a better looking screen than BLU ULTRA, because it has a lot better 160 x 128 resolution, a better pixels density and a way bigger display. BLU ULTRA has much more memory capacity to store more games and applications than Cricket CAPTR.
Cricket CAPTR and BLU ULTRA both have similar processing units, they have a 0-Core CPU. Cricket CAPTR shoots much better photographs and videos than BLU ULTRA. The Cricket CAPTR counts with a really longer battery lifetime than BLU ULTRA, because it has a 920mAh battery capacity against 500mAh.
Cricket CAPTR costs exactly the same than BLU ULTRA.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.