Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
3G OnlySM-N9000
| Global Score | |
| 51.6 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| BLU | Samsung |
| Android 4.2 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| -- | 2013-09-04 |
| 5.43 x 2.76 x 0.27 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.15 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black, Green, Pink and White | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 306 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Samsung Exynos 5 Octa chipset |
| Quad-Core 1500 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A15 (Quad-Core 1900 MHz + Quad-Core 1300 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| PowerVR 544 GPU | ARM Mali-T628 MP6 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 8.37 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 4.4 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.49 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| SIM | Micro SIM |
| 4.6 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 250 hours standby time 5 hours talk time | 490 hours standby time 20 hours talk time |
| 3.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 3 has an overall score of 80.7, which is way better than BLU Vivo 4.8 HD's 51.6 general score. Galaxy Note 3's design is thicker and somewhat heavier than the BLU Vivo 4.8 HD. Both devices in our current comparison have Android operating system, but Galaxy Note 3 has a more recent 5.0 version while BLU Vivo 4.8 HD has Android 4.2.
The Galaxy Note 3 has a little faster processing unit than BLU Vivo 4.8 HD, because it has a greater number of cores (and they are faster), an additional graphics co-processor and a greater amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has a bit better looking display than BLU Vivo 4.8 HD, because it has a higher amount of pixels per inch of screen, a bigger screen and a lot higher resolution of 1920 x 1080px.
Galaxy Note 3 counts with a much bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than BLU Vivo 4.8 HD, because it has more internal storage capacity and a SD card slot that allows up to 64 GB. Samsung Galaxy Note 3 counts with a way better battery performance than BLU Vivo 4.8 HD, because it has a 60 percent bigger battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 shoots way better photos and videos than BLU Vivo 4.8 HD, because it has a much higher 3840x2160 video quality and a camera in the back with a way higher 13 MP resolution.
Even being the best phone in our comparison, the Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is also the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.