Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 54.3 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| BLU | |
| Android 4.4.2 | -- |
| -- | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.50 x 2.65 x 0.20 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 3.42 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 165.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 306 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6592 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Octa-Core 1700 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-450 (650 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 4.4 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.59 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 750 hours standby time 24 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 is much better than the BLU Vivo Air, with a score of 80 against 54.3. Although it's the best cellphone in this comparison, Google Pixel 3 is a way heavier and way thicker cellphone than the BLU Vivo Air. Google Pixel 3 counts with a display that's just as good as the display in BLU Vivo Air, although the Google Pixel 3 also has a higher screen pixel density, a way better resolution of 1080 x 2160px and a quite bigger display.
The Google Pixel 3 features a bit better CPU than BLU Vivo Air, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics co-processor, and they both have 8 cores, the Google Pixel 3 also counts with 3 GB more RAM. Google Pixel 3 counts with a much greater storage capacity to store more games and applications than BLU Vivo Air, because it has 64 GB internal storage capacity.
Google Pixel 3 shoots a lot better videos and photos than BLU Vivo Air, because it has a way higher video definition and a back-facing camera with much more mega pixels. Google Pixel 3 counts with a really longer battery lifetime than BLU Vivo Air, because it has a 39 percent bigger battery size.
The Google Pixel 3 is not only the best devices between the ones we are comparing, but it's also cheap compared to the other phone, which makes it a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.