Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 54.3 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| BLU | LG |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| -- | 2018-06-01 |
| 5.50 x 2.65 x 0.20 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 3.42 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black and White | Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 165.00 | $ 170.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 306 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6592 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Octa-Core 1700 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-450 (650 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 4.4 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.59 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 750 hours standby time 24 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG G7 ThinQ is way better than BLU Vivo Air, getting an 81 score against 54.3. Both of these phones use Android OS, but the LG G7 ThinQ has the newer 9.0 Pie version and BLU Vivo Air has Android 4.4.2, so it provides the user a couple nice extra features and performance tweaks. Despite being the best in our current comparison, the LG G7 ThinQ design is noticeably thicker and notably heavier than BLU Vivo Air.
The LG G7 ThinQ counts with just a bit better hardware performance than BLU Vivo Air, because although it has doesn't have an extra GPU, and they both have the same number of cores, the LG G7 ThinQ also counts with 3 GB more RAM. The LG G7 ThinQ features a sharper screen than BLU Vivo Air, because it has a lot greater screen pixels density, a larger screen and a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 3120.
LG G7 ThinQ features a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than BLU Vivo Air, because it has more internal memory and a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG G7 ThinQ features a really longer battery performance than BLU Vivo Air, because it has a 43% more battery capacity.
The LG G7 ThinQ features a lot better camera than BLU Vivo Air, because it has a way higher 16 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back and a much higher (4K) video definition.
LG G7 ThinQ costs a bit more than BLU Vivo Air, but you can get a much better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.