Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 54.3 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| BLU | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.2 | -- |
| -- | 2017-04-21 |
| 5.50 x 2.65 x 0.20 inches | 5.86 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches |
| 3.42 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| Black and White | Arctic silver, Burgundy red, Coral blue, Maple gold, Midnight black, Orchid gray and Rose pink |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 165.00 | $ 173.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 306 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6592 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Octa-Core 1700 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-450 (650 MHz) GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 4.4 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.59 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 750 hours standby time 24 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S8 has a general score of 81.7, which is a lot better than BLU Vivo Air's score of 54.3. The Galaxy S8 construction is extremely heavier and much thicker than BLU Vivo Air. The Galaxy S8 features a bit sharper display than BLU Vivo Air, because it has a larger screen, a way greater pixel count per inch in the display and a lot better 1440 x 2960 resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy S8 has a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than BLU Vivo Air, because it has 64 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 256 GB. Galaxy S8 has just a little better hardware performance than BLU Vivo Air, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics co-processor, and they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy S8 also counts with a higher amount of RAM.
The Galaxy S8 features a way better camera than BLU Vivo Air, because it has a lot higher 3840x2160 video resolution and a lot better resolution back-facing camera. Galaxy S8 has a really longer battery duration than BLU Vivo Air, because it has a 3000mAh battery capacity against 2100mAh.
Samsung Galaxy S8 costs a little more than the BLU Vivo Air, but you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.