Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 54.3 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| BLU | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.2 | -- |
| -- | 2018-03-16 |
| 5.50 x 2.65 x 0.20 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 3.42 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black and White | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 165.00 | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 306 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6592 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Octa-Core 1700 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-450 (650 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 4.4 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.59 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 750 hours standby time 24 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S9 has an overall score of 83.3, which is much better than BLU Vivo Air's global score of 54.3. The Samsung Galaxy S9 design is incredibly thicker and heavier than the BLU Vivo Air. The Galaxy S9 counts with a little more vivid screen than BLU Vivo Air, because it has a larger screen, a much better 1440 x 2960 resolution and a way better display pixel density.
The Samsung Galaxy S9 counts with a bit superior processing unit than BLU Vivo Air, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics co-processor, and they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy S9 also counts with more RAM. The Galaxy S9 features a very superior memory to install games and applications than BLU Vivo Air, because it has a SD extension slot that allows up to 400 GB and 64 GB internal storage.
The Galaxy S9 counts with a much better camera than BLU Vivo Air, because it has a much higher video quality and a much better resolution back camera. Galaxy S9 features a superior battery duration than BLU Vivo Air, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity against 2100mAh.
Even being the best phone of the ones we compare here, Samsung Galaxy S9 is also cheap compared to the other phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.