Search


Compare phones

Global Score
54.359.4
Basic Information
BLUSamsung
Android 4.4.2Android 2.3.5
--2012-02-23
5.50 x 2.65 x 0.20 inches4.82 x 2.59 x 0.48 inches
3.42 ounces4.20 ounces
Black and White--
Scratch-Resistant GlassScratch-Resistant Glass
$ 165.00$ 140.00
Display / Screen
4.8 inches3.7 inches
720 x 1280 pixels (HD)480 x 800 pixels
AMOLEDSuper AMOLED
306 pixels per inch252 pixels per inch
Capacitive, Multi-touchCapacitive, Multi-touch
8.37.8
Performance
MediaTek MT6592 chipset--
ARM Cortex-A7 (Octa-Core 1700 MHz) processor Single-Core 1400 MHz processor
1 GB RAM512 MB RAM
ARM Mali-450 (650 MHz) GPUYes GPU
9.187.74
Storage
16 GB internal memory4 GB internal memory
No SD card slotmicroSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot
4.43.82
Camera
8.00 MP + 5.00 MP5.00 MP + 1.30 MP
--f/2.60 aperture
1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution
7.597.59
Networks
Wi-FiWi-Fi
Mobile HotspotMobile Hotspot
--HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM
Micro SIMSIM
34
Battery Life
2100mAh Li-Ion Battery1650mAh Li-Ion Battery
Non-Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
750 hours standby time
24 hours talk time
384 hours standby time
8 hours talk time
43.52
Other Features
Bluetooth 4.0Bluetooth 3.0
GPSGPS
Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity SensorAccelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor
FM Radio--

Comparison review

Samsung Rugby Smart has a score of 59.4, which is a little bit better than the BLU Vivo Air's general score of 54.3. Both of these phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Rugby Smart has the previous 2.3.5 version while BLU Vivo Air has Android 4.4.2 version. Although it's the best device we are comparing here, Samsung Rugby Smart is a somewhat heavier and way thicker device than BLU Vivo Air.

The BLU Vivo Air has a little bit better looking display than Samsung Rugby Smart, because it has a larger display, a lot higher resolution of 1280 x 720 and a little more pixels per inch of display. The BLU Vivo Air features a more powerful processing unit than Samsung Rugby Smart, because it has more processing cores, more RAM and an additional graphics co-processor.

Samsung Rugby Smart has a camera that's just as good as BLU Vivo Air's camera, although the Samsung Rugby Smart has a much worse resolution camera and a way worse 1280x720 video resolution. BLU Vivo Air has a greater memory capacity for applications and games than Samsung Rugby Smart, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 16 GB internal storage capacity.

BLU Vivo Air counts with superior battery life than Samsung Rugby Smart, because it has a 27 percent more battery size.

Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, the Samsung Rugby Smart is also a bargain compared to the other ones.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.