Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 57.9 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| BLU | |
| Android 4.2 | -- |
| -- | 2017-10-19 |
| 5.71 x 2.76 x 0.22 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 4.69 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Black and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 155.00 | $ 152.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6592 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Octa-Core 1700 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-450 (650 MHz) GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 4.4 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.92 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 750 hours standby time 24 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.24 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 XL is a lot better than the BLU Vivo IV, getting a score of 82.5 against 57.9. Despite being the best cellphone in this review, the Google Pixel 2 XL is a much heavier and extremely thicker cellphone than BLU Vivo IV. The Google Pixel 2 XL's CPU is just as good as the BLU Vivo IV one, because although the Google Pixel 2 XL has doesn't have a graphics co-processor, and they both have the same number of cores, it also counts with more RAM memory.
BLU Vivo IV features a little bit better looking display than Google Pixel 2 XL, although it has a just a little less pixels per screen inch, a little smaller display and a lot worse resolution of 1920 x 1080. The Google Pixel 2 XL has much more storage to install applications and games than BLU Vivo IV, because it has 128 GB internal memory.
Google Pixel 2 XL has a much longer battery performance than BLU Vivo IV, because it has 3520mAh of battery capacity against 2300mAh. Google Pixel 2 XL shoots way better photographs and videos than BLU Vivo IV, because although it has a worse 12.2 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
In addition to being the best phone in our current comparison, the Google Pixel 2 XL is also cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.