Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 57.9 | 63.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| BLU | Nokia |
| Android 4.2 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-05-29 |
| 5.71 x 2.76 x 0.22 inches | 5.93 x 2.82 x 0.36 inches |
| 4.69 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Tempered blue |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 155.00 | $ 110.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 1440 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 441 pixels per inch | 293 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6592 chipset | MediaTek Helio A22 MT6761 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Octa-Core 1700 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Quad-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-450 (650 MHz) GPU | PowerVR GE8300 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 4.4 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 7.92 | 7.48 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 750 hours standby time 24 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.24 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Nokia C2 Tava is a bit better than the BLU Vivo IV, getting a 63.3 score against 57.9. These phones use Android operating system, but the Nokia C2 Tava has the newer 10 version and BLU Vivo IV has Android 4.2 version, so it provides you a couple nice extra features. The Nokia C2 Tava body is a lot heavier and incredibly thicker than the BLU Vivo IV.
BLU Vivo IV features a bit more powerful processor than Nokia C2 Tava, and although they both have 2 GB of RAM memory, the BLU Vivo IV also has 4 more processing cores and a GPU. BLU Vivo IV features a lot better display than Nokia C2 Tava, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a lot greater display pixel density and a lot better resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels.
Nokia C2 Tava counts with much more memory to store more games and applications than BLU Vivo IV, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 128 GB and 32 GB internal memory capacity. Nokia C2 Tava has longer battery performance than BLU Vivo IV, because it has a 30% more battery size.
BLU Vivo IV shoots clearer photographs and videos than Nokia C2 Tava, and although they both have the same video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the BLU Vivo IV also has a back facing camera with much more mega pixels.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, Nokia C2 Tava is also a bargain compared to the other devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.