Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 62.9 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| BLU | |
| Android 7.0 Nougat | -- |
| 2018-02-21 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.32 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black | Black, Blue and White |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 132.00 | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5 inches |
| 1440 x 720 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 520 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P25 MT6757CD chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 16 nm (Octa-Core 2600 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP2 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4010mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 is a lot better than the BLU Vivo X, getting a general score of 81.6 against 62.9. Google Pixel 2 is a just a little bit thinner and incredibly lighter cellphone than BLU Vivo X, even when both were only released 4 months apart. BLU Vivo X has a bit more powerful processor than Google Pixel 2. They have 8 cores and a 4 GB RAM.
Google Pixel 2 counts with a bit better looking screen than BLU Vivo X, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a much greater pixels amount per inch of display and a way better resolution of 1080 x 1920px. Google Pixel 2 has a lot bigger storage capacity for games and applications than BLU Vivo X, because it has more internal memory.
The Google Pixel 2 counts with a lot better camera than BLU Vivo X, because although it has a camera in the back with less MP, it also counts with a bigger aperture to take better photos and video in low light environments and a bigger camera sensor which offers a higher photo and video quality. The BLU Vivo X features a superior battery life than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 49 percent bigger battery size.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the Google Pixel 2 is also cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.