Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 62.9 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| BLU | Motorola |
| Android 7.0 Nougat | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2018-02-21 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.32 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 132.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1440 x 720 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| 520 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.7 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P25 MT6757CD chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 16 nm (Octa-Core 2600 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP2 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4010mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola DROID Turbo is way better than the BLU Vivo X, with a 77.9 score against 62.9. Motorola DROID Turbo is a way older and incredibly thicker phone than BLU Vivo X, but Motorola made it just a little lighter anyway. Both phones in our current comparison come with Android OS, but the Motorola DROID Turbo has older 4.4.4 version while BLU Vivo X has Android 7.0 Nougat.
The Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a bit superior processor than BLU Vivo X, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM and less cores (but faster), it also counts with an additional graphics co-processor. The Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a much more vibrant display than BLU Vivo X, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a lot higher pixels number per screen inch and a way better 2560 x 1440 resolution.
The Motorola DROID Turbo has as much storage to install games and applications as the BLU Vivo X one, both of them have exactly the same internal storage capacity. Motorola DROID Turbo features a greater camera than BLU Vivo X, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Motorola DROID Turbo also has a much more megapixels back facing camera.
The BLU Vivo X features just a little better battery performance than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a 4010mAh battery capacity instead of 3900mAh.
Motorola DROID Turbo costs a bit more money than the BLU Vivo X, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.