Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 60.3 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| BLU | |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-12-06 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.19 x 3.00 x 0.31 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Black, Blue and White |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 134.00 | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 440 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.03 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 is a lot better than the BLU VIVO XL4, with an 81.6 score against 60.3. The Google Pixel 2 construction has the same thickness than the BLU VIVO XL4, but it's somewhat lighter. Google Pixel 2 has a little more vivid display than BLU VIVO XL4, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a much greater display density and a higher 1080 x 1920 pixels resolution.
Google Pixel 2 counts with a little better processing power than BLU VIVO XL4, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 2 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Google Pixel 2 has a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than BLU VIVO XL4, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory.
The Google Pixel 2 features a very superior camera than BLU VIVO XL4, because although it has a back-facing camera with a worse resolution, it also counts with a way higher video quality. BLU VIVO XL4 counts with a very superior battery life than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 48% greater battery capacity.
The Google Pixel 2 not only is the best devices of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also the cheapest one, making this phone a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.