Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 48.4 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| BLU | LG |
| Windows Phone 8.1 | -- |
| -- | 2018-06-08 |
| 4.92 x 2.52 x 0.42 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 4.41 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Orange, Pink, White and Yellow | Black and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 6 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | P-OLED |
| 233 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Quad-Core 1200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 302 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.28 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 3.82 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 6.71 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1950mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 700 hours standby time 19 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.84 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ has an overall score of 81.3, which is way better than the BLU Win Jr's general score of 48.4. LG V35 ThinQ's design is thinner but incredibly heavier than the BLU Win Jr. The LG V35 ThinQ features a better CPU than BLU Win Jr, because although it has doesn't have a graphics co-processor, it also counts with a larger amount of RAM memory and more cores.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a lot better display than BLU Win Jr, because it has a much higher number of pixels per inch in the screen, a really larger display and a way better resolution of 1440 x 2880px. The LG V35 ThinQ features a way better camera than BLU Win Jr, because it has a lot better video resolution and a much better 16 MP resolution camera in the back.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than BLU Win Jr, because it has a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB and more internal storage. The LG V35 ThinQ has a really longer battery duration than BLU Win Jr, because it has a 69 percent larger battery size.
The LG V35 ThinQ costs a bit more than BLU Win Jr, but you can get a much better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.