Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 52.2 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Casio | |
| Android 4.0 | -- |
| 2013-06-25 | 2017-10-19 |
| 5.10 x 2.70 x 0.50 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black | Black, Blue and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 125.00 | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 5 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| LCD | AMOLED |
| 233 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Dual-Core 1500 MHz processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.1 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.72 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.38 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 384 hours standby time 9 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.68 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 has an overall score of 81.6, which is a lot better than the Casio G'zOne Commando 4G LTE's 52.2 global score. The Google Pixel 2 is a much newer phone, and it is also lighter and notably thinner than the Casio G'zOne Commando 4G LTE. The Google Pixel 2 features a better screen than Casio G'zOne Commando 4G LTE, because it has a way better 1080 x 1920 resolution, a way better amount of pixels per inch in the screen and a bigger display.
The Google Pixel 2 has a faster CPU than Casio G'zOne Commando 4G LTE, because it has a higher amount of RAM and a greater number of cores (and faster). The Google Pixel 2 takes a lot better photos and videos than Casio G'zOne Commando 4G LTE, because it has a lot higher video definition and a camera in the back with way more megapixels.
The Google Pixel 2 features much more memory capacity to install applications and games than Casio G'zOne Commando 4G LTE, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. The Google Pixel 2 has a much longer battery duration than Casio G'zOne Commando 4G LTE, because it has 2700mAh of battery capacity.
Google Pixel 2 costs a little more than Casio G'zOne Commando 4G LTE, but you can get a much better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.