Compare phones
Motorola Moto E
for America| Global Score | |
| 52.2 | 56.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Casio | Motorola |
| Android 4.0 | Android 4.4.4, 4.4.3, 4.4.2 |
| 2013-06-25 | 2014-05-13 |
| 5.10 x 2.70 x 0.50 inches | 4.91 x 2.55 x 0.48 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 5.01 ounces |
| Black | Black and White |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 125.00 | $ 105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 4.3 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 540 x 960 pixels |
| LCD | -- |
| 233 pixels per inch | 256 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 8210 chipset |
| Dual-Core 1500 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A7 (Dual-Core 1200 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 1 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 302 (400 MHz) GPU |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 4 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.72 | 3.82 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 5.00 MP |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | -- |
| 6.38 | 5.5 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.6 | 4.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 1980mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 384 hours standby time 9 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.68 | 3.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Moto E is a bit better than Casio G'zOne Commando 4G LTE, having a 56.9 score against 52.2. Moto E's design is newer, just a little bit thinner and somewhat lighter than Casio G'zOne Commando 4G LTE. Both of these phones come with Android operating system, but Moto E has a newer 4.4.4 version while Casio G'zOne Commando 4G LTE has Android 4.0 version, so it offers some additional features and improved performance.
The Motorola Moto E's processing unit is just as good as the Casio G'zOne Commando 4G LTE one, and although the Motorola Moto E has an additional graphics co-processor, they both have the same number of cores and the same RAM memory amount. The Motorola Moto E has just a bit better looking display than Casio G'zOne Commando 4G LTE, because it has a little greater count of pixels in each inch of display, a little bigger display and a little higher resolution of 960 x 540 pixels.
Casio G'zOne Commando 4G LTE features a much bigger storage to install applications and games than Motorola Moto E, and although they both have a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 32 GB, the Casio G'zOne Commando 4G LTE also has 12 GB more internal memory. The Casio G'zOne Commando 4G LTE captures much clearer videos and photos than Motorola Moto E, because it has a back camera with much more mega pixels.
Motorola Moto E counts with a little better battery performance than Casio G'zOne Commando 4G LTE, because it has a 1980mAh battery size against 1800mAh.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we compare here, Moto E is also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.