Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 53.9 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Cat | |
| Android 7.0 Nougat | -- |
| 2017-08-31 | 2019-10-24 |
| 5.75 x 2.93 x 0.50 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 330.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 312 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 8909 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7, 32-bit, 28 nm (Quad-Core 1100 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 304 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.01 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.72 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.38 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 is way better than the CAT S31, getting a general score of 81.9 against 53.9. The Google Pixel 4 design is noticeably newer, incredibly thinner and lighter than the CAT S31. Google Pixel 4 counts with a much better screen than CAT S31, because it has a way higher 1080 x 2280 resolution, a better display density and a larger display.
The Google Pixel 4 has a very superior CPU than CAT S31, because it has a greater number of faster cores and 4 GB more RAM memory. Google Pixel 4 has a greater memory capacity to install applications and games than CAT S31, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 64 GB internal memory.
The CAT S31 has a superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity. The Google Pixel 4 has a lot better camera than CAT S31, because it has a camera with a much better 12.2 megapixels resolution and a much higher (4K) video resolution.
Google Pixel 4 is a little more expensive than the CAT S31, but you can get a much better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.