Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
64 GBSM-N9005
| Global Score | |
| 53.9 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Cat | Samsung |
| Android 7.0 Nougat | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2017-08-31 | 2013-09-04 |
| 5.75 x 2.93 x 0.50 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Pink and White |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 330.00 | $ 320.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 312 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 8909 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7, 32-bit, 28 nm (Quad-Core 1100 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 304 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 8.01 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.38 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.1 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is a lot better than the CAT S31, getting a score of 81.1 against 53.9. The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 construction is lighter and thinner than CAT S31, although it was released many years before. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has the older 5.0 version and CAT S31 has Android 7.0 Nougat.
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 features a much more vibrant screen than CAT S31, because it has a bigger screen, a lot higher 1920 x 1080px resolution and a bit better pixel number in each inch of display. The Galaxy Note 3 counts with a greater hardware performance than CAT S31, and although they both have 4 cores, the Galaxy Note 3 also has a graphics co-processor and a larger amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy Note 3 counts with a greater camera than CAT S31, because it has a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a much better 13 MP resolution camera in the back. Galaxy Note 3 features a much better memory capacity to store more apps and games than CAT S31, because although it has an external SD slot that allows 64 GB smaller, it also counts with 64 GB internal memory.
CAT S31 features longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is also the cheapest, which makes it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.