Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 51.9 | 74.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Cat | Xiaomi |
| Android 5.1 | Android 10 |
| 2015-08-01 | 2019-10-16 |
| 5.70 x 2.92 x 0.49 inches | 6.23 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| -- | Cosmic Purple, Moonlight White, Nebula Purple, Neptune Blue and Space Black |
| -- | Glass and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 230.00 | $ 227.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 540 x 960 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | IPS LCD |
| 234 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Single-Core 1100 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 304 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 7.56 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.16 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.59 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.8 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 936 hours standby time 18 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 is a lot better than CAT S40, having a 74.6 score against 51.9. Both phones in this review work with Android OS (operating system), but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 has 10 version while CAT S40 has Android 5.1, so it gives some additional features. Xiaomi Redmi Note 8's construction is newer and way thinner, but a little heavier than CAT S40.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 has a sharper screen than CAT S40, because it has a much better resolution of 1080 x 2340px, way more pixels per inch of screen and a much larger screen. Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 counts with a much greater storage capacity to store more games and applications than CAT S40, because it has more internal memory capacity and a SD memory slot that admits up to 128 GB.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 has a much powerful CPU than CAT S40, because it has 7 more cpu cores and a greater amount of RAM. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 has a lot better camera than CAT S40, because it has a much higher 3840x2160 video definition and a back camera with way more MP. Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 counts with longer battery life than CAT S40, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we compare here, Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 is also cheaper than the other phone, which makes it an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.