Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 67.7 | 74.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Cat | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-08-20 | 2016-10-04 |
| 6.24 x 3.02 x 0.47 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.28 inches |
| 8.75 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Black | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 586.00 | $ 280.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3510mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto Z Play has an overall score of 74.4, which is a little bit better than the CAT S62 Pro's general score of 67.7. These phones come with Android OS, but the Motorola Moto Z Play has a newer 8.0 Oreo version and CAT S62 Pro has Android 10. Motorola Moto Z Play is an noticeably older phone than the CAT S62 Pro, but it's extremely lighter and incredibly thinner anyway.
CAT S62 Pro features a little more vivid screen than Moto Z Play, because it has a little larger screen, a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2160 pixels and a quite greater pixels density. CAT S62 Pro features a slightly better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto Z Play, because although it has a slot for an external memory card that holds 1,7 TB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The CAT S62 Pro counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Motorola Moto Z Play, and although they both have the same number of cores, the CAT S62 Pro also has 3 GB more RAM memory. Motorola Moto Z Play features a little bit better camera than CAT S62 Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for shooting photos in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a lot better (4K) video quality and a much more mega pixels camera in the back.
The CAT S62 Pro counts with a bit longer battery lifetime than Moto Z Play, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3510mAh.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, Moto Z Play is also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.