Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
3G OnlySM-N9000
| Global Score | |
| 40.6 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Celkon | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| -- | 2013-09-04 |
| 4.69 x 2.48 x 0.42 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 3.60 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Blue and White | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 320 x 480 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 165 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 6.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Samsung Exynos 5 Octa chipset |
| Single-Core 1000 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A15 (Quad-Core 1900 MHz + Quad-Core 1300 MHz) processor |
| 256 MB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Yes GPU | ARM Mali-T628 MP6 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 7.29 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 1.32 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 3.20 MP + 0.30 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 5.5 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM |
| 2.8 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1400mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 490 hours standby time 20 hours talk time |
| 3.12 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 3 is much better than the Celkon Campus A35K, having an 80.7 score against 40.6. These phones use Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Note 3 has 5.0 version while Celkon Campus A35K has Android 4.4.2, so it provides the user a couple additional features and performance optimizations. The Galaxy Note 3 body is notably thinner but notably heavier than the Celkon Campus A35K.
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 features a very superior processing unit than Celkon Campus A35K, because it has 7 more cores, a greater amount of RAM and an extra graphics co-processor. Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has a much better looking display than Celkon Campus A35K, because it has a much higher amount of pixels per inch in the screen, a much better 1920 x 1080px resolution and a lot bigger display.
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 features a much greater memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Celkon Campus A35K, because it has an external memory card slot that admits up to 64 GB. Galaxy Note 3 has a way better battery life than Celkon Campus A35K, because it has a 129% larger battery size.
The Galaxy Note 3 captures much clearer photographs and videos than Celkon Campus A35K, because it has a back facing camera with a way better 13 mega pixels resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is not only the best devices in this comparison, but it's also the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.