Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 47.2 | 51.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Celkon | ZTE |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 7.1 Nougat |
| -- | 2017-09-19 |
| 4.80 x 2.48 x 0.37 inches | 5.73 x 2.83 x 0.36 inches |
| 4.30 ounces | 5.00 ounces |
| Black | Black |
| $ 249.00 | $ 80.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 5 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 854 x 480 pixels |
| TFT | -- |
| 233 pixels per inch | 196 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 6.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6582M chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 8909 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Quad-Core 1300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A7, 32-bit, 28 nm (Quad-Core 1100 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 1 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 MP2 (416 MHz) GPU | Adreno 304 GPU |
| 8.37 | 8.01 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 8 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot |
| 3.82 | 4.62 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 5.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution |
| 5.94 | 6.05 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3.4 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1400mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 3.12 | 4.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
ZTE Tempo X has a global score of 51.7, which is slightly better than Celkon Campus Whizz Q42's score of 47.2. ZTE Tempo X is a heavier but just a little thinner phone than the Celkon Campus Whizz Q42. These devices have Android OS (Operating System), but ZTE Tempo X has a newer 7.1 Nougat version and Celkon Campus Whizz Q42 has Android 4.4.2 version.
The Celkon Campus Whizz Q42 features a sharper display than ZTE Tempo X, because although it has a way smaller display and a quite lower resolution of 800 x 480 pixels, it also counts with a quite better screen pixels density. The Celkon Campus Whizz Q42 counts with a little better performance than ZTE Tempo X, because although it has 512 MB lesser RAM, and they both have a Quad-Core processor, the Celkon Campus Whizz Q42 also counts with a graphics co-processor.
ZTE Tempo X has a superior storage for applications and games than Celkon Campus Whizz Q42, and although they both have an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 32 GB, the ZTE Tempo X also has more internal memory. The ZTE Tempo X captures just a bit better videos and photos than Celkon Campus Whizz Q42. They have the same resolution back camera.
The ZTE Tempo X features a really longer battery performance than Celkon Campus Whizz Q42, because it has a 2200mAh battery capacity.
The ZTE Tempo X not only is the best devices of the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones, which makes this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.