Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 49.1 | 53.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Celkon | Kyocera |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 4.4.2, 4.3 |
| -- | 2014-05-05 |
| 5.73 x 2.86 x 0.39 inches | 5.02 x 2.50 x 0.43 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 4.90 ounces |
| White | -- |
| $ 249.00 | $ 160.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 4.5 inches |
| 480 x 854 pixels | 540 x 960 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 196 pixels per inch | 245 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6582 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon MSM8926 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Quad-Core 1300 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 1200 MHz processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 1,5 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 MP2 (416 MHz) GPU | Adreno 305 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 8.46 | 8.37 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 8 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot |
| 3.82 | 4.62 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 6.38 | 7.48 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| EDGE, GPRS and GSM | EV-DO A |
| SIM, Dual SIM | -- |
| 3.4 | 3.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2000mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 22 hours talk time | 193 hours standby time 14 hours talk time |
| 4.96 | 3.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Kyocera Hydro VIBE is slightly better than Celkon Q3000, getting a general score of 53.8 against 49.1. These phones use the same Android 4.4.2 OS (Operating System). The Kyocera Hydro VIBE is a just a bit thicker but somewhat lighter device than the Celkon Q3000. The Kyocera Hydro VIBE features a bit more vivid screen than Celkon Q3000, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a slightly higher 960 x 540 resolution and a just a little greater count of pixels per inch in the display.
The Kyocera Hydro VIBE has a much greater storage for apps and games than Celkon Q3000, and although they both have a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 32 GB, the Kyocera Hydro VIBE also has 8 GB internal memory capacity. The Celkon Q3000 has a bit superior CPU than Kyocera Hydro VIBE, although it has a worse 416 MHz graphics co-processor and a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Quad-Core processor.
The Kyocera Hydro VIBE shoots much better photographs and videos than Celkon Q3000. They have a 8 MP resolution back facing camera. Celkon Q3000 has a very superior battery lifetime than Kyocera Hydro VIBE, because it has a 3000mAh battery size against 2000mAh.
The Kyocera Hydro VIBE is not only the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.