Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 53.4 | 58.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Celkon | Nokia |
| Android 4.2.1 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| -- | 2018-08-10 |
| 5.67 x 2.80 x 0.35 inches | 6.05 x 3.06 x 0.38 inches |
| 4.83 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| -- | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Metal and Plastic |
| $ 155.00 | $ 115.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 441 pixels per inch | 267 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9 | 7 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 MSM8917 chipset |
| Quad-Core 1500 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Quad-Core 1400 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 1 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 308 GPU |
| 8.37 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 8 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.72 | 5.62 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 7.04 | 7.48 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4.2 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.24 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Nokia 2.1 is slightly better than the Celkon S1, having a score of 58.4 against 53.4. Both of these devices use Android OS, but the Nokia 2.1 has a more recent 9.0 Pie version and Celkon S1 has Android 4.2.1. Despite being the best in this comparison, the Nokia 2.1 is a much heavier and a bit thicker device than Celkon S1.
The Celkon S1 features a much better screen than Nokia 2.1, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with way more pixels per inch in the screen and a much better 1920 x 1080 resolution. The Celkon S1 counts with a bit better processing power than Nokia 2.1. Both of them have a Quad-Core CPU and the same RAM amount.
Celkon S1 features a slightly better memory to install applications and games than Nokia 2.1, because although it has an external memory slot that supports up to 32 GB against 128 GB, it also counts with 16 GB internal memory capacity. The Nokia 2.1 takes a little bit better videos and photos than Celkon S1, although it has a back facing camera with lot less MP.
Nokia 2.1 features a much longer battery life than Celkon S1, because it has a 74% more battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the Nokia 2.1 is also very cheap compared to the other ones, which makes this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.