Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 48.6 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Celkon | LG |
| Windows Phone 8.1 | -- |
| -- | 2018-06-08 |
| 4.94 x 2.56 x 0.41 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 4.25 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black and White | Black and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 6 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| -- | P-OLED |
| 233 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8212 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Quad-Core 1200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.37 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 3.82 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 5.94 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1500mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 3.28 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ is way better than Celkon Win 400, with an 81.3 score against 48.6. LG V35 ThinQ is a much thinner but a lot heavier phone than Celkon Win 400. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a quite superior performance than Celkon Win 400, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processor, it also counts with 4 more CPU cores and a greater amount of RAM.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with a more vivid screen than Celkon Win 400, because it has a way higher 1440 x 2880px resolution, a lot better screen pixels density and a much larger screen. The LG V35 ThinQ features a lot bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Celkon Win 400, because it has an external SD slot that supports up to 1,95 TB and more internal memory.
The LG V35 ThinQ features a very superior battery lifetime than Celkon Win 400, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity against 1500mAh. The LG V35 ThinQ shoots way better photos and videos than Celkon Win 400, because it has a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a way more mega pixels back-facing camera.
The LG V35 ThinQ costs a little more money than Celkon Win 400, but it's still a great deal, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.