Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
3G OnlySM-N9000
| Global Score | |
| 47.9 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Celkon | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| -- | 2013-09-04 |
| 7.09 x 4.11 x 0.34 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 8.82 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 600 x 1024 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 170 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 6.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT8312 chipset | Samsung Exynos 5 Octa chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Dual-Core 1200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A15 (Quad-Core 1900 MHz + Quad-Core 1300 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 (500 MHz) GPU | ARM Mali-T628 MP6 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 8.19 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 4.62 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 5.5 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM |
| 3.5 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2500mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 490 hours standby time 20 hours talk time |
| 4.48 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has a general score of 80.7, which is much better than the Celkon Xion s CT695's 47.9 overall score. The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 body is a little bit thinner and extremely lighter than Celkon Xion s CT695. Both of these phones work with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has a more recent 5.0 version and Celkon Xion s CT695 has Android 4.4.2.
The Galaxy Note 3 counts with an incredibly better looking screen than Celkon Xion s CT695, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a much greater pixel amount per inch in the screen and a lot higher resolution of 1920 x 1080. The Galaxy Note 3 counts with much more storage capacity for applications and games than Celkon Xion s CT695, because it has an external memory card slot that allows up to 64 GB and 64 GB internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy Note 3 features a better performance than Celkon Xion s CT695, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory, a better graphics processor running at 600 megahertz and a higher number of cores. Galaxy Note 3 features longer battery performance than Celkon Xion s CT695, because it has a 28 percent larger battery capacity.
Galaxy Note 3 shoots a lot better pictures and videos than Celkon Xion s CT695, because it has a back camera with a way higher resolution.
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also the cheapest one, making it a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.