Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Coolpad | Apple |
| Android 10 | -- |
| -- | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.52 x 3.01 x 0.34 inches | 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Silver | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| LCD | OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SDM6125 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 32 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.45 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.25 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone XS Max is much better than Coolpad Legacy Brisa, getting an 84.5 score against 72.6. The Apple iPhone XS Max body is somewhat thinner but a little heavier than Coolpad Legacy Brisa. IPhone XS Max features a sharper screen than Coolpad Legacy Brisa, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the iPhone XS Max also has a just a little higher display density and a slightly better resolution of 1242 x 2688.
Apple iPhone XS Max has just a bit better performance than Coolpad Legacy Brisa, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and less cpu cores , it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit. The Coolpad Legacy Brisa features a slightly better memory capacity to install applications and games than iPhone XS Max, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 128 GB.
The Coolpad Legacy Brisa features superior battery life than Apple iPhone XS Max, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 3179mAh. IPhone XS Max takes a lot better pictures and videos than Coolpad Legacy Brisa, because although it has a camera with a way lower 12 mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.