Compare phones
Motorola W175
W175, W175g, W180| Global Score | |
| 27.9 | 28.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Cricket | Motorola |
| 2009-09-22 | 2007-10-11 |
| 3.54 x 1.81 x 0.74 inches | 4.48 x 1.69 x 0.55 inches |
| 2.82 ounces | 2.99 ounces |
| $ 40.00 | $ 40.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 1.8 inches | -- |
| 128 x 160 pixels | 128 x 128 pixels |
| TFT | STN |
| 114 pixels per inch | 101 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.4 | 5.2 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| Camera | |
| 0.30 MP | -- |
| 3.63 | 0 |
| CDMA | GSM |
| -- | SIM |
| 0.1 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 920mAh Li-Ion Battery | 940mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 250 hours standby time 5 hours talk time | 465 hours standby time 9.8 hours talk time |
| 2.48 | 2.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | -- |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola W175 is a little bit better than Cricket CAPTR, with a 28.6 score against 27.9. Motorola W175's construction is thinner than Cricket CAPTR, although it is just a little heavier and was released many years before. The Cricket CAPTR counts with a little bit better display than Motorola W175, because it has a just a little more pixels per display inch and a slightly higher resolution of 160 x 128px.
Motorola W175's processor is very similar to Cricket CAPTR's processing unit, both have 0 cpu cores. Cricket CAPTR and Motorola W175 both feature really similar memory to install applications and games. Cricket CAPTR takes much clearer photos and videos than Motorola W175. The Motorola W175's battery duration is very similar to Cricket CAPTR's battery duration, although the Motorola W175 also has a 2% more battery size.
The Motorola W175 and the Cricket CAPTR cost the same, which makes this phone a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.