Compare phones
Nokia 1661
1661, 1662| Global Score | |
| 27.9 | 27.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Cricket | Nokia |
| 2009-09-22 | 2008-11-04 |
| 3.54 x 1.81 x 0.74 inches | 4.25 x 1.77 x 0.53 inches |
| 2.82 ounces | 2.89 ounces |
| $ 40.00 | $ 40.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 1.8 inches | 1.8 inches |
| 128 x 160 pixels | 128 x 160 pixels |
| TFT | TFT |
| 114 pixels per inch | 114 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.4 | 5.3 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| Camera | |
| 0.30 MP | -- |
| 3.63 | 0 |
| CDMA | GSM |
| -- | SIM |
| 0.1 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 920mAh Li-Ion Battery | 860mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 250 hours standby time 5 hours talk time | 500 hours standby time 3.9 hours talk time |
| 2.48 | 2.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | -- |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Cricket CAPTR has a general score of 27.9, which is a little bit better than Nokia 1661's global score of 27.3. Cricket CAPTR's design is newer and a little lighter, but thicker than Nokia 1661. Nokia 1661's processing unit is just as good as Cricket CAPTR's processing unit, both of them have the same number of cores.
The Cricket CAPTR features just a bit better looking screen than Nokia 1661. They have an equal 160 x 128 resolution, a display with the same size and the same screen pixels density. Cricket CAPTR takes greater pictures and videos than Nokia 1661. The Nokia 1661 counts with as much storage for applications and games as the Cricket CAPTR.
The Cricket CAPTR counts with just a bit longer battery life than Nokia 1661, because it has a 920mAh battery capacity.
Cricket CAPTR costs the same than the Nokia 1661.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.