Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 27.9 | 26.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Cricket | Nokia |
| -- | Symbian 9.1 |
| 2009-09-22 | 2006-09-12 |
| 3.54 x 1.81 x 0.74 inches | 4.60 x 2.74 x 0.55 inches |
| 2.82 ounces | 5.10 ounces |
| $ 40.00 | $ 39.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 1.8 inches | -- |
| 128 x 160 pixels | 320 x 240 pixels (QVGA) |
| TFT | TFT |
| 114 pixels per inch | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.4 | 3.4 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 81,92 MB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | miniSD external memory slot |
| 0 | 0.5 |
| Camera | |
| 0.30 MP | -- |
| 3.63 | 0 |
| CDMA | EDGE and GSM |
| -- | SIM |
| 0.1 | 0.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 920mAh Li-Ion Battery | 1500mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 250 hours standby time 5 hours talk time | 336 hours standby time 5.5 hours talk time |
| 2.48 | 3.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 2.0 |
| -- | Infra-red port |
Comparison review
Cricket CAPTR has an overall score of 27.9, which is slightly better than the Nokia E62's global score of 26.2. Cricket CAPTR's design is noticeably newer and noticeably lighter than Nokia E62's, but it is thicker. Cricket CAPTR counts with a lot better screen than Nokia E62, although it has a much lower 160 x 128 pixels resolution.
The Nokia E62 features a way bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Cricket CAPTR. Nokia E62's processor is just as good as the Cricket CAPTR one, they have a 0-Core processor. Nokia E62 features a much longer battery lifetime than Cricket CAPTR, because it has a 63% bigger battery size.
The Cricket CAPTR takes a lot better pictures and videos than Nokia E62.
The Cricket CAPTR is a little more expensive than the Nokia E62, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.