Search


Compare phones

Global Score
34.236.8
Basic Information
EtenSamsung
Windows Mobile Professional 5.0--
--2009-08-06
4.44 x 2.34 x 0.61 inches3.90 x 2.37 x 0.59 inches
5.15 ounces3.50 ounces
$ 100.00$ 90.00
Display / Screen
2.8 inches2.6 inches
240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)320 x 240 pixels (QVGA)
TFTTFT
143 pixels per inch154 pixels per inch
ResistiveNo touch screen
5.85.9
Samsung SC3 2442 (Single-Core 400 MHz) processor processor
64 MB RAM--
GPU GPU
6.395.76
microSD external memory slotmicroSD, microSDHC external memory slot
Camera
2.00 MP2.00 MP
4.734.73
Networks
Wi-Fi--
EDGE and GSMCDMA
SIM--
2.70.1
Battery Life
1530mAh Li-Polymer Battery1000mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
200 hours standby time
7 hours talk time
6 hours talk time
3.362.56
Other Features
Bluetooth 2.0Bluetooth 2.0
GPSGPS
FM Radio--

Comparison review

Samsung Reclaim has a global score of 36.8, which is just a bit better than the Eten X500's global score of 34.2. The Samsung Reclaim body is a little thinner and way lighter than the Eten X500. The Samsung Reclaim features a slightly better looking display than Eten X500, because although it has a bit smaller display, and they both have the same 240 x 320 resolution, the Samsung Reclaim also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch of screen.

Samsung Reclaim's storage for apps and games is very similar to the Eten X500 one, although the Samsung Reclaim has no SD memory card expansion slot. Eten X500 has a better performing CPU than Samsung Reclaim, because it has 1 more cores. The Eten X500 features a superior battery lifetime than Samsung Reclaim, because it has a 1530mAh battery size.

Samsung Reclaim has a camera that's very similar to the camera in Eten X500, both have a back-facing camera with a 2 mega-pixels.

Samsung Reclaim not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a bit cheaper.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.