Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.5 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 2023-09-15 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.36 x 2.98 x 0.38 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Matte Black, Sky Blue and Transparent Edition | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2700 x 1224 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 456 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm QCM6490 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2700 MHz processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 643 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ has an overall score of 81.3, which is slightly better than the Fairphone 5's 75.5 score. LG V35 ThinQ's design is much thinner and extremely lighter than Fairphone 5, even though it was released many years before. Fairphone 5 features a bit sharper display than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a quite worse display pixels density and a quite lower resolution of 1224 x 2700 pixels, it also counts with a bit larger display.
LG V35 ThinQ features a better storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Fairphone 5, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB. LG V35 ThinQ features a CPU that is very similar to the processing unit in Fairphone 5, and although the LG V35 ThinQ has lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Fairphone 5 features longer battery duration than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 27% bigger battery capacity. The LG V35 ThinQ has a slightly better camera than Fairphone 5, because although it has a way tinier back-facing camera sensor which gives a much worse photo and video quality and a lot less MP back facing camera, it also counts with a bigger aperture to take better captures and video in low light environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.