Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.5 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2023-09-15 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.36 x 2.98 x 0.38 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Matte Black, Sky Blue and Transparent Edition | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2700 x 1224 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 456 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm QCM6490 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2700 MHz processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 643 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A70 is a bit better than Fairphone 5, having a 76.9 score against 75.5. Both phones in our current comparison come with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy A70 has an older 10 version while Fairphone 5 has Android 13 version. The Samsung Galaxy A70 body is somewhat thinner and lighter than Fairphone 5, even though it was released 4 years before.
Fairphone 5 features just a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A70, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Fairphone 5 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Fairphone 5 features a much better screen than Galaxy A70, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a just a little better pixels count in each screen inch and a little bit higher resolution of 1224 x 2700px.
Fairphone 5 captures greater pictures and videos than Galaxy A70, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for taking photos or video in low-light environments, it also counts with a much larger camera sensor capturing lot better quality photos and videos. Galaxy A70 has just a bit more storage capacity to install games and applications than Fairphone 5, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
Samsung Galaxy A70 has a bit superior battery lifetime than Fairphone 5, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 4200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.