Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.5 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 2023-09-15 | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.36 x 2.98 x 0.38 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Matte Black, Sky Blue and Transparent Edition | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2700 x 1224 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 456 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm QCM6490 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2700 MHz processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 643 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 has an overall score of 89, which is better than the Fairphone 5's score of 75.5. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 design is notably lighter and somewhat thinner than Fairphone 5, although it was released many years before. Galaxy Note10 counts with a processor that is just as good as the Fairphone 5 one, they have a 8 GB RAM and the same number of cores.
Fairphone 5 has a better looking display than Galaxy Note10, because it has a just a bit higher pixels density, a quite larger screen and a slightly better resolution of 1224 x 2700 pixels. Galaxy Note10 captures just a bit better pictures and videos than Fairphone 5, because although it has a way less mega pixels resolution back-facing camera and a way smaller camera sensor capturing way lower quality videos and photos, it also counts with a lot larger aperture to capture better photos in low light situations.
Galaxy Note10 and Fairphone 5 both count with really similar storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos, both of them have the same 256 GB internal storage. Fairphone 5 counts with longer battery performance than Galaxy Note10, because it has a 20% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.