Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.5 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2023-09-15 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.36 x 2.98 x 0.38 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Matte Black, Sky Blue and Transparent Edition | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2700 x 1224 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 456 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm QCM6490 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Octa-Core 2700 MHz processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 643 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is much better than Fairphone 5, with a general score of 92.3 against 75.5. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G design is lighter and incredibly thinner than the Fairphone 5, although it was released 3 years before. Both phones in this comparison include Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has older 11 version while Fairphone 5 has Android 13 version.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a bit more powerful CPU than Fairphone 5. Both of them have the same number of cores and 8 GB of RAM memory. The Fairphone 5 counts with a little bit better display than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher screen density and a quite better 1224 x 2700 resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G shoots just a bit better photographs and videos than Fairphone 5, because although it has a much smaller back-facing camera sensor and a lot less mega pixels resolution camera, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has as much storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos as the Fairphone 5, both have the same internal storage capacity.
Fairphone 5 has greater battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 27% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.