Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 40.7 | 77.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Garmin | Samsung |
| Android 2.1, 1.6 | Android 4.4.2, 4.3, 4.2.2 |
| 2010-02-11 | 2013-03-14 |
| 4.57 x 2.46 x 0.49 inches | 5.38 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 4.90 ounces | 4.59 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Red and White |
| -- | Polycarbonate |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 205.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.5 inches | 5 inches |
| 320 x 480 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 165 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 6.4 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 MSM7227 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 600 APQ8064T chipset |
| ARM11 (Single-Core 600 MHz) processor | Krait 300 (Quad-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 256 MB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| GPU | Adreno 320 (400 MHz) GPU |
| 6.84 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 2.5 | 7.56 |
| Camera | |
| 3.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 320 x 240 (30 fps) (QVGA) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 5.5 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| SIM | Micro SIM |
| 3.5 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1500mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2600mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 600 hours standby time 8 hours talk time | 17 hours talk time |
| 3.28 | 4.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S4 is much better than Garmin-Asus nuvifone A50, having a 77.3 score against 40.7. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy S4 has a more recent 4.4.2 version while Garmin-Asus nuvifone A50 has Android 2.1. Samsung Galaxy S4's construction is incredibly newer, just a bit lighter and way thinner than Garmin-Asus nuvifone A50.
The Samsung Galaxy S4 counts with a lot better looking screen than Garmin-Asus nuvifone A50, because it has a way bigger display, a way higher amount of pixels per display inch and a much better resolution of 1920 x 1080px. The Samsung Galaxy S4 features a much better performing processing unit than Garmin-Asus nuvifone A50, because it has a larger amount of RAM, a greater number of cores and an additional graphics processing unit.
Samsung Galaxy S4 counts with a greater camera than Garmin-Asus nuvifone A50, because it has a back facing camera with a lot higher resolution and a way higher video resolution. The Galaxy S4 counts with a way bigger memory to store more apps and games than Garmin-Asus nuvifone A50, because it has 32 GB internal storage capacity.
Galaxy S4 features a really longer battery performance than Garmin-Asus nuvifone A50, because it has 2600mAh of battery capacity against 1500mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy S4 costs a bit more than Garmin-Asus nuvifone A50, but you can get a much better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.