Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 46.7 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Gigabyte | LG |
| Android 4.4 | -- |
| -- | 2018-06-08 |
| 5.28 x 2.64 x 0.35 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 4.41 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| -- | Black and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 480 x 854 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 218 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Spreadtrum SC7731 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Single-Core 1200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-400 MP2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 7.56 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 4.62 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 6.05 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 240 hours standby time 12 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.44 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.1, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ has a score of 81.3, which is a lot better than GIGABYTE GSmart Essence's 46.7 general score. LG V35 ThinQ is a way heavier but somewhat thinner phone than GIGABYTE GSmart Essence. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a much better performing processor than GIGABYTE GSmart Essence, because it has more RAM memory and a higher number of cores.
LG V35 ThinQ features a much better looking screen than GIGABYTE GSmart Essence, because it has a lot bigger display, a way greater display pixel density and a way better resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a much better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than GIGABYTE GSmart Essence, because it has more internal storage and a SD card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
The LG V35 ThinQ has a much better battery performance than GIGABYTE GSmart Essence, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity against 1600mAh. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a much better camera than GIGABYTE GSmart Essence, because it has a camera in the back with way more megapixels.
LG V35 ThinQ costs a bit more money than the GIGABYTE GSmart Essence, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.