Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 56.5 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Gigabyte | Samsung |
| Android 4.2 | -- |
| -- | 2018-03-16 |
| 5.79 x 2.84 x 0.28 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 155.00 | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6589T chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR SGX544 (384 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.92 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3.9 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2500mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 250 hours standby time 10.5 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.48 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S9 has an overall score of 83.3, which is a lot better than the GIGABYTE GSmart Guru's general score of 56.5. Even being the best device in this comparison review, the Samsung Galaxy S9 construction is a little bit heavier and thicker than the GIGABYTE GSmart Guru. The GIGABYTE GSmart Guru counts with a little sharper display than Galaxy S9, although it has a way worse resolution of 1920 x 1080, a bit less pixels per inch in the display and a bit smaller display.
Samsung Galaxy S9 has a quite superior performance than GIGABYTE GSmart Guru, because although it has doesn't have a graphics co-processor, it also counts with a larger amount of RAM and a higher number of cores (and also faster). Samsung Galaxy S9 has a lot better camera than GIGABYTE GSmart Guru, because although it has a worse 12 mega-pixels resolution camera, it also counts with a way better 3840x2160 video definition.
The Galaxy S9 counts with much more storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than GIGABYTE GSmart Guru, because it has a SD extension slot that admits up to 400 GB and 32 GB more internal memory. The Galaxy S9 features better battery life than GIGABYTE GSmart Guru, because it has a 20 percent more battery capacity.
The Galaxy S9 is a bit more expensive than GIGABYTE GSmart Guru, but you can get a much better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.