Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 54.7 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Gigabyte | LG |
| Android 4.4 | -- |
| -- | 2018-06-08 |
| 5.77 x 2.89 x 0.34 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 4.76 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| -- | Black and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm MSM8228 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Quad-Core 1600 MHz processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 305 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.06 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 6.82 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 350 hours standby time 12 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.16 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ has a global score of 81.3, which is a lot better than the GIGABYTE GSmart GX2's 54.7 global score. The LG V35 ThinQ is a somewhat heavier but somewhat thinner device than the GIGABYTE GSmart GX2. LG V35 ThinQ has a little better hardware performance than GIGABYTE GSmart GX2, because although it has doesn't have a graphics co-processor, it also counts with 4 more cores and more RAM memory.
The GIGABYTE GSmart GX2 counts with a little bit better display than LG V35 ThinQ, although it has a just a little worse pixel number per inch in the screen, a way worse 1920 x 1080 resolution and a little bit smaller screen. The LG V35 ThinQ features a lot bigger memory for games and applications than GIGABYTE GSmart GX2, because it has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB and 64 GB internal memory.
LG V35 ThinQ has a much longer battery lifetime than GIGABYTE GSmart GX2, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity. LG V35 ThinQ captures much clearer photos and videos than GIGABYTE GSmart GX2, because it has a back-facing camera with a better 16 mega-pixels resolution.
LG V35 ThinQ costs a little more than GIGABYTE GSmart GX2, but you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.