Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
3G OnlySM-N9000
| Global Score | |
| 51.6 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Gigabyte | Samsung |
| Android 4.4 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| -- | 2013-09-04 |
| 5.71 x 2.87 x 0.33 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| -- | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek MT6582 chipset | Samsung Exynos 5 Octa chipset |
| Quad-Core 1300 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A15 (Quad-Core 1900 MHz + Quad-Core 1300 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 MP2 (416 MHz) GPU | ARM Mali-T628 MP6 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 4.62 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.93 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM |
| 4 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 300 hours standby time 8 hours talk time | 490 hours standby time 20 hours talk time |
| 3.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is a lot better than the GIGABYTE GSmart Mika M2, having an 80.7 score against 51.6. These devices work with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has newer 5.0 version while GIGABYTE GSmart Mika M2 has Android 4.4, counting with some extra features. Samsung Galaxy Note 3's body has the same thickness than the GIGABYTE GSmart Mika M2, but it is heavier.
The Galaxy Note 3 has a little sharper display than GIGABYTE GSmart Mika M2, because it has a much better resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels, a little bigger display and a better quantity of pixels per inch of display. Galaxy Note 3 features a little bit better hardware performance than GIGABYTE GSmart Mika M2, because it has a greater amount of RAM, a larger number of cores (and faster) and a faster graphics processor working at 600 MHz.
The Galaxy Note 3 counts with a lot better camera than GIGABYTE GSmart Mika M2. Both have a back-facing camera with a 13 mega-pixels. The Galaxy Note 3 features a lot bigger memory capacity for applications and games than GIGABYTE GSmart Mika M2, because it has 56 GB more internal storage and a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 64 GB.
Galaxy Note 3 has a much better battery lifetime than GIGABYTE GSmart Mika M2, because it has a 3200mAh battery capacity.
The Galaxy Note 3 not only is the best devices between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also cheap compared to the GIGABYTE GSmart Mika M2.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.