Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 51.3 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Gigabyte | LG |
| Android 4.4.2 | -- |
| 2014-10-22 | 2018-06-08 |
| 5.67 x 2.78 x 0.33 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.15 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| -- | Black and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek MT6582 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Quad-Core 1300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali 400 MP2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.19 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 4.62 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.04 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1900mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 150 hours standby time 4.5 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.76 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ is a lot better than the GIGABYTE GSmart Mika M3, having a overall score of 81.3 against 51.3. The LG V35 ThinQ construction is way newer and somewhat thinner than GIGABYTE GSmart Mika M3's, but it is also just a bit heavier. The LG V35 ThinQ features a bit better display than GIGABYTE GSmart Mika M3, because it has a way higher pixel density, a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 2880px and a larger screen.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with a much greater storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than GIGABYTE GSmart Mika M3, because it has more internal storage capacity and a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a quite better processing power than GIGABYTE GSmart Mika M3, because it has a larger amount of RAM memory and 4 more cpu cores.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a very superior battery lifetime than GIGABYTE GSmart Mika M3, because it has a 74 percent more battery capacity. The LG V35 ThinQ features a much better camera than GIGABYTE GSmart Mika M3, because it has a more megapixels camera in the back.
The LG V35 ThinQ costs a little more money than the GIGABYTE GSmart Mika M3, but you can get a much better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.