Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 49.2 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Gigabyte | Samsung |
| Android 4.2 | -- |
| -- | 2018-03-16 |
| 5.35 x 2.60 x 0.41 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.87 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| -- | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 155.00 | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 480 x 854 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 218 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6572 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Dual-Core 1300 MHz processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.28 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 3.82 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.27 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 320 hours standby time 8 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.68 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S9 is a lot better than GIGABYTE GSmart Rey R3, having an 83.3 score against 49.2. Samsung Galaxy S9's design is somewhat heavier but somewhat thinner than the GIGABYTE GSmart Rey R3. Samsung Galaxy S9 features a much better display than GIGABYTE GSmart Rey R3, because it has a lot higher display pixels density, a lot higher 1440 x 2960px resolution and a larger display.
The Samsung Galaxy S9 counts with a faster processing unit than GIGABYTE GSmart Rey R3, because although it has doesn't have an extra GPU, it also counts with a greater amount of RAM and a higher number of cores. Galaxy S9 features a much greater memory capacity for apps and games than GIGABYTE GSmart Rey R3, because it has more internal memory and a SD memory slot that supports up to 400 GB.
Galaxy S9 features a really longer battery life than GIGABYTE GSmart Rey R3, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy S9 shoots way better photos and videos than GIGABYTE GSmart Rey R3, because it has a back facing camera with a way better 12 megapixels resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy S9 costs a bit more money than the GIGABYTE GSmart Rey R3, but you can get a much better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.