Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 52.1 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Gigabyte | Samsung |
| Android 4.2 | -- |
| 2014-03-26 | 2018-03-16 |
| 6.61 x 3.27 x 0.33 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| -- | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 155.00 | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 245 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6582 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Quad-Core 1300 MHz processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 MP2 (416 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 4.62 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.37 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 255 hours standby time 12 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S9 is a lot better than GIGABYTE GSmart Saga S3, with a general score of 83.3 against 52.1. Samsung Galaxy S9's construction has the same thickness than GIGABYTE GSmart Saga S3, but it is lighter. Galaxy S9 has a sharper screen than GIGABYTE GSmart Saga S3, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a much higher resolution of 1440 x 2960 and a way greater display pixels density.
The Galaxy S9 features a much greater storage capacity to store more apps and games than GIGABYTE GSmart Saga S3, because it has an external SD slot that holds up to 400 GB and more internal storage. The Galaxy S9 has a superior processing power than GIGABYTE GSmart Saga S3, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processing unit, it also counts with a larger amount of RAM and a higher number of cores.
Samsung Galaxy S9 takes much better pictures and videos than GIGABYTE GSmart Saga S3, because it has a way bigger aperture for better captures in poorly lited environments and a back-facing camera with way more mega pixels. The Samsung Galaxy S9 and GIGABYTE GSmart Saga S3 both count with very similar batteries duration.
The Samsung Galaxy S9 is a bit more expensive than GIGABYTE GSmart Saga S3, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.