Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 49.3 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Gigabyte | LG |
| Android 4.2 | -- |
| -- | 2018-06-08 |
| 5.73 x 2.85 x 0.35 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black and White | Black and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6589T chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR SGX544 (384 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.55 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 1.32 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 6.93 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3.9 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 600 hours standby time 4.5 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ has a global score of 81.3, which is much better than GIGABYTE GSmart Sierra S1's general score of 49.3. LG V35 ThinQ's construction is thinner and a little lighter than GIGABYTE GSmart Sierra S1. LG V35 ThinQ has a faster CPU than GIGABYTE GSmart Sierra S1, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics co-processor, it also counts with 4 more CPU cores and more RAM memory.
LG V35 ThinQ has a little sharper display than GIGABYTE GSmart Sierra S1, because it has a larger display, a way higher resolution of 1440 x 2880 and a way greater screen density. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a superior memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than GIGABYTE GSmart Sierra S1, because it has an external memory card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
LG V35 ThinQ features a superior battery life than GIGABYTE GSmart Sierra S1, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity. The LG V35 ThinQ takes greater photographs and videos than GIGABYTE GSmart Sierra S1, because it has a back camera with a better 16 mega-pixels resolution.
LG V35 ThinQ costs a bit more than GIGABYTE GSmart Sierra S1, but you can get a much better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.