Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 49.6 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Gigabyte | LG |
| Android 4.2 | -- |
| -- | 2018-06-08 |
| 5.67 x 2.87 x 0.37 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black and White | Black and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8230 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB (533 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 305 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.37 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 1.32 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/3.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.59 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1900mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 150 hours standby time 2.5 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.76 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ has a score of 81.3, which is way better than the GIGABYTE GSmart Simba SX1's global score of 49.6. The LG V35 ThinQ body is just a bit lighter and thinner than GIGABYTE GSmart Simba SX1. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a better performing processor than GIGABYTE GSmart Simba SX1, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processor, it also counts with a greater amount of RAM and a larger number of cores.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with a bit sharper screen than GIGABYTE GSmart Simba SX1, because it has a way higher 1440 x 2880 resolution, a way greater pixel amount per inch of display and a bigger display. LG V35 ThinQ features a very superior camera than GIGABYTE GSmart Simba SX1, because it has a lot larger diafragm aperture to take better captures in low-light situations and a better resolution camera in the back.
The LG V35 ThinQ features a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than GIGABYTE GSmart Simba SX1, because it has an external memory card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. LG V35 ThinQ features a much longer battery lifetime than GIGABYTE GSmart Simba SX1, because it has a 3300mAh battery size.
The LG V35 ThinQ costs a bit more than GIGABYTE GSmart Simba SX1, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.