Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 48.8 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Gigabyte | LG |
| Android 4.2 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| -- | 2018-06-01 |
| 4.96 x 2.44 x 0.39 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 4.27 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| -- | Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 165.00 | $ 170.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 233 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6572 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Dual-Core 1300 MHz processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-400 (Dual-Core 500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.55 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 3.82 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.27 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1400mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 150 hours standby time 4.5 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.12 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G7 ThinQ is a lot better than the GIGABYTE GSmart T4, having a score of 81 against 48.8. The LG G7 ThinQ is a a lot heavier but a lot thinner phone than GIGABYTE GSmart T4. Both phones we are comparing work with Android OS (Operating System), but the LG G7 ThinQ has a more recent 9.0 Pie version and GIGABYTE GSmart T4 has Android 4.2 version, giving some additional features.
The LG G7 ThinQ features a better processing power than GIGABYTE GSmart T4, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics co-processor, it also counts with a larger amount of RAM memory and more processing cores. The LG G7 ThinQ has a lot better looking screen than GIGABYTE GSmart T4, because it has a really larger screen, a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 3120px and much more pixels per screen inch.
LG G7 ThinQ has a lot better camera than GIGABYTE GSmart T4, because it has a lot higher resolution back facing camera. LG G7 ThinQ counts with a much better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than GIGABYTE GSmart T4, because it has an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB and more internal storage capacity.
The LG G7 ThinQ features a way better battery duration than GIGABYTE GSmart T4, because it has a 3000mAh battery capacity against 1400mAh.
LG G7 ThinQ costs a little more than the GIGABYTE GSmart T4, but you can get a much better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.