Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 48.8 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Gigabyte | Samsung |
| Android 4.2 | -- |
| -- | 2017-04-21 |
| 4.96 x 2.44 x 0.39 inches | 5.86 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches |
| 4.27 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| -- | Arctic silver, Burgundy red, Coral blue, Maple gold, Midnight black, Orchid gray and Rose pink |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 165.00 | $ 173.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 233 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6572 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Dual-Core 1300 MHz processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-400 (Dual-Core 500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.55 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 3.82 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.27 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1400mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 150 hours standby time 4.5 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.12 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S8 is way better than GIGABYTE GSmart T4, getting an 81.7 score against 48.8. The Samsung Galaxy S8 is a way thinner but notably heavier cellphone than GIGABYTE GSmart T4. Samsung Galaxy S8 has a sharper display than GIGABYTE GSmart T4, because it has a really larger display, a much greater count of pixels per inch in the display and a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 2960 pixels.
The Galaxy S8 features a bit better hardware performance than GIGABYTE GSmart T4, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processing unit, it also counts with a higher number of cores and more RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy S8 counts with a much greater memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than GIGABYTE GSmart T4, because it has more internal storage and an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 256 GB.
Galaxy S8 takes much clearer videos and photos than GIGABYTE GSmart T4, because it has a way more mega pixels camera in the back. The Galaxy S8 counts with a superior battery lifetime than GIGABYTE GSmart T4, because it has a 3000mAh battery size instead of 1400mAh.
Samsung Galaxy S8 is a bit more expensive than the GIGABYTE GSmart T4, but you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.